It’s that time of year again – the heart rates of new grads are pumping as they look towards their future, and the heart rates of campus recruiters are jumping as they reach out to connect with a new wave of prospects. When they meet in the middle, a disconnect between reality and expectation ensues.
The divide between the expectations of the Class of 2016 versus the realities leaves recruiters with two options: an opportunity to explore and educate or to fail both the grad and company.
Ah recruiting metrics. They can provide such a wealth of information, but they can also fool you by providing unnecessary data. Some find them the necessary evil while others appreciate their value and have built sophisticated processes in order to capture every possible data point to measure their recruiting effectiveness. I, for one, have always loved recruiting metrics. From the time I stepped into corporate recruiting, I was determined to eliminate subjectivity on all fronts. At the end of the day, I was so determined to be prepared to answer that elusive question from my leaders and/or hiring managers: “Why?”. There was no way I would let myself answer with a vague “I don’t know” or “because” response. Instead, I would rifle through any data I could lay my hands on to put together informed and valuable answers. Remember, this was 15-20 years ago when the thought of recruiting efficiency was at it’s infancy and it was acceptable to point the finger at the recruiter for the blame.